Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:TRCTheRaulChannelProductionsInc2021 from Brazil. The range Special:Contributions/2804:1A68:10E:BDAE:0:0:0:0/64 has been active recently. Special:Contributions/186.137.232.172 was blocked in January. Binksternet (talk) 18:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2804:1A68:10E:BDAE:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by IP from Shwapneel ahnaf 1999 (talk · contribs). MrOllie (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by IP from Shwapneel ahnaf 1999 (talk · contribs). MrOllie (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Settlement demolished in 2005 is not a primary topic to current PIA conflict; gets very little editing attention. Daniel Case (talk) 20:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very few edits in a while. Clearly not a primary topic. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Again, little editing since October 2023; I don't think it's a primary topic. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Per others, minimal editing. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As per others. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hasan al-Utrush and others

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since January, a person behind some IPs has had their eyes on these articles, wanting to a huge and unsourced genealogy tree. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs, some socks. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 22:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated insertion of exceptional and unverified WP:BLPCRIME claims by POV-pushing IPs based in Canada. Borgenland (talk) 23:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Their loaded edit summaries say it all. Borgenland (talk) 23:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Appears to be related to misinformation such as [1] and [2]. Borgenland (talk) 03:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_misinformation_and_disruption_by_183.99.45.103 4300streetcar (talk) 01:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP user claiming that the Autonomous administration of N&E Syria has joined the STG. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 05:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Semi-protection Disruptive editing started again a day after year-long protection expired. Barry Wom (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism. 202.67.47.28 (talk) 13:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unencyclopedic trivia. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Discospinster: I see you're currently active, please consider this request. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 17:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I will keep an eye on the article to see if it keeps happening. ... discospinster talk 18:01, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It's at 7rr at this point. protection requested. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:54, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Too much vandalism and disruptive editing Sparkbean (talk) 17:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism and unsourced material. BattleshipMan (talk) 17:46, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Disrupting editing 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:9189:80E6:2B2B:B2F0 (talk) 17:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Biographies of living person 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:9189:80E6:2B2B:B2F0 (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Biographies of living persons 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:9189:80E6:2B2B:B2F0 (talk) 18:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: An IP user ([3]) has been repetedly adding the Lê dysnasty to the list ([4], [5], [6]) and copying a citation already on the page as its source despite it not supporting this. The user has not reponded to the message I left on their talk page. DervotNum4 (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to it expiring yesterday, there already has been so much reverting, I propose this goes indefinite, due to the popularity and vandalism of this page... Valorrr (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of previous editing behaviours stemming from previous protection; while I am sure only temporary will be given, WP:DUCK applies, as exampled as other American soap pages (ie: General Hospital, The Young and the Restless, et al.) that this will be an ongoing issue. livelikemusic (TALK!) 18:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent vandalism from multiple users. ogusokumushi( ୧ ‧₊˚ 🎐 ⋅ ) 19:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 19:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:69B0:4AF0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent, ongoing addition of unsourced content and/or original research to article by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: Page has been protected since 2010 (15 years ago). I think we can try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Not much vandalism since page protection in 2013, I think we can try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    "Israeli soldiers have summarily executed Palestinian civilians, often in front of their families." This is one citation that leads to another citation (why not list the original reference?) where it describes a single alleged incident that has been disputed. The original citation is careful to use the term 'alleged' and 'still under verification' and yet the wiki page does not say 'alleged' or 'accused of' - and goes on to add the word 'often', even though only one alleged incident is referenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.230.248.39 (talk) 02:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.